8.2 C
London
Wednesday, January 29, 2025
HomeNewsInter-faith marriage laws: SC says essential to have HCs view

Inter-faith marriage laws: SC says essential to have HCs view

Related stories

J&K police release list of seized assets used for terrorism

Jammu, Feb 16 : The police in Jammu and...

Israel says 4 mln citizens vaccinated against Covid-19

Jerusalem, Feb 17 : Israeli officials announced that some...

Hungary to receive first shipment of Chinese vaccines

Beijing, Feb 17 : A Hungarian cargo plane loaded...

New Delhi, Feb 3 : The Supreme Court on Wednesday said the pleas challenging the legislations against inter-faith marriage are very important, therefore it is essential to have benefits of the views of the High Courts concerned on these laws.
Senior advocate Sanjay Parikh, appearing for NGO People’s Union for Civil Liberties, contended before a bench headed by Chief Justice S. A. Bobde that innocent people are being targeted due to these draconian laws.
The Chief Justice replied that it is not examining the merit of the laws at all now, but instead is examining the jurisdiction. Parikh insisted that he has circulated a note giving details of the incidents establishing the serious impact of The Uttar Pradesh Prohibition of Unlawful Conversion Of Religion Ordinance, 2020 and the Uttarakhand Freedom Of Religion Act, 2018. He submitted that a similar act is in the pipeline for Madhya Pradesh too. The petitioners have moved the top court seeking stay on these laws aimed at stopping ‘love jihad’.
The bench, also comprising Justices A.S. Bopanna and V. Ramasubramanian, replied: “The High Court is already seized of the matter. We would like to have the benefit of the High Court’s view on this.” Parikh noted that the top court had already issued notice in the matter on January 6, but the bench said it has only issued notice and not passed any order in the matter.
As Parikh insisted that it is a very important matter, the Chief Justice said: “We are not denying it; we know it is important. Therefore, we like to have the benefit of views of the High Court before hearing the matter.”

Subscribe

- Never miss a story with notifications

- Gain full access to our premium content

- Browse free from up to 5 devices at once

Latest stories